Blog Archives

Class actions: When is the lawyer’s relationship with the litigation funder too close?

Representative or group proceedings (commonly known as ‘class actions’) are typically lawyer driven. As the costs can be substantial, the costs of such proceedings are increasingly being covered by litigation funders.  In two recent cases, Bolitho v Banksia Securities Limited

Posted in Papers

Section 588FF(3) – the exclusive source of power to extend the time for bringing voidable transactions proceedings

In Grant Samuel Corporate Finance Pty Limited v Fletcher, the High Court of Australia has held that the bringing of an application within the time required by s 588FF(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is a precondition to the

Posted in Papers

Unrepresented litigant found to have abandoned a limitation defence

A person intending to present his or her case before a court without legal representation would be wise to first take a look at the case of Chapman v Colson, a recent decision of the Supreme Court of New South

Posted in Papers

A warning to self-represented litigants – Don’t pursue hopeless and nonsensical claims!

Two recent decisions of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, Wilmink v Westpac Banking Corporation and Atkinson v Commissioner of Taxation, should serve as a warning to self-represented litigants not to pursue hopeless and nonsensical claims.  In

Posted in Papers

Indefeasibility of title – the ambit of the “fraud” exceptions

An important exception to the indefeasibility of title of registered proprietors of land under Torrens legislation is fraud.  The High Court in Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd  recently clarified the ambit of the “fraud” exceptions to the

Posted in Papers

Archives

Categories